Three Events. One Question.

Last week was one of those weeks that reminded me why I do what I do. Three very different professional learning experiences. Three very different communities of people. And one question that kept surfacing for me: are we doing enough to ensure that professional learning actually meets people where they are? As a coach, I think about this all the time. Coaching, at its heart, is about meeting the individual where they're at. That is, understanding their context, their starting point, their goals, and designing a learning journey that serves them. Professional learning, when it's done well, should do exactly the same thing. Last week offered no shortage of ideas, questions, and observations to reflect upon.

When One Person Speaks to Many Worlds

The week began at school, where our Principal, Chris Bradbury and Prof Phil Cummins had organised professional learning across several different communities- our student school leaders, our leadership team, an ACT Teachers' Guild event that brought together staff and educators from across the ACT, and a masterclass for our parents and carers. Each group was distinct. Each brought different experiences, different questions, different needs.

It was so interesting to watch Phil navigate each audience across different sessions. Phil and I have known each other and each other's work for years. That matters more than we sometimes acknowledge. He was able to draw the through-line between professional learning and coaching in a way that resonated deeply for me, because he understood the lens I bring to this work. When someone already knows you, your thinking, your values, your professional history, the conversation starts somewhere different. That's the power of relationship in professional learning, and it's something no program or platform can replicate.
 
It's also what I kept returning to across the whole week: the moments that mattered most were the ones built on connection. Reconnecting with educators I hadn't seen in years. Conversations that picked up where they left off. The particular ease that comes when someone already knows your work, and you know theirs. That kind of knowing is what coaching is built on, and it's what the best professional learning is built on too.

EduTECH Sydney: Big Energy, Little Space to Think

EduTECH was a different experience entirely. Huge. Energetic. I've known Andy Hargreaves for years and always enjoy his presentations, so it was great to catch his keynote and then fall into one of our long conversations afterwards about the things keeping leaders, teachers and academics up at night: the current climate in schools, the teacher shortage crisis, and the complicated role that tech and social media are playing in it all.                    

The workshops were embedded within the commercial exhibition space, which created a kind of noise, literal and metaphorical, that was hard to escape. Some sessions had you wearing headphones just to hear the presenter, which meant losing those small spontaneous moments of turning to the person beside you to share a thought. Others relied on microphones and good listening skills, both of which were tested against the constant ambient hum of a busy conference floor. People moved constantly around you, not necessarily in search of learning, but for products, connections, the next shiny thing. It was at times overwhelming, and yet that's the nature of an event this size. The value is still there, just buried a little deeper. You have to go looking for it, usually in the quieter corners, in the unplanned conversations that end up staying with you long after you've forgotten the slide decks. 

What I noticed most was what was missing: silence. Space to think. A quiet corner to process what you'd just heard. I tried to have informal conversations with people during sessions, but we had to physically remove ourselves from the space to do it. Randomly meeting up in different parts of the world, Dr John Cleary is one of the most generous people I've had the privilege of learning from. He freely gives his time and knowledge in a way that stays with you and his way of being is inspiring. I feel lucky to have crossed paths year ago and valued our informal chat in a quieter space. The opportunity to debrief, discuss, or ask the what ifs or share your wonderings was limited, yet, the message was clear. AI is here, and the sessions that cut through the noise did so because they asked the right questions.

 

Laura Bain asked, What if we designed schools today? Her presentation reminded me of Sir Ken Robinson and do you remember, “Most Likely to Succeed” (Wagner & Dintersmith) and “What School Could Be” (Dintersmith). The big questions haven't changed. We just keep finding new reasons to avoid answering them.

 

The conversation around AI in education has been dominated by fear. Fear that students are cheating, that assessment is broken, that we've lost control of what we can measure. But that's the wrong starting point. Used thoughtfully, AI has the potential to personalise learning, provide meaningful feedback, and free teachers and administrators to do the human work that no algorithm can replace. 

That brought me to a question I haven't been able to shake: who is going to help teachers learn about AI and how it is influencing teaching and learning that is sometimes reflected in assessment. I thought about ISTE in 2013 and 2015, where I met technology coaches who were embedded in classrooms. Those who are skilled, knowledgeable educators whose job was to work alongside teachers to integrate technology meaningfully. Do we need that model again, but for AI?

Leaving EduTECH, I was struck by how quickly AI is evolving and much there is to learn. However, we all need space that learning deserves. Teachers can't do it alone, and sessions at a conference will never be enough. We need to think carefully about how we enable that learning, and about who we trust to lead it. 

 

The EA Conference: A Reminder That PL Is For Everyone

The third experience was a mini conference for Executive Assistants orchestrated by Kristine Niven. I joined because I wanted to support this event and hear my previous principal, Dr Briony Scott, present. But I also joined because, as Director of Professional Practice, I genuinely believe that professional learning is not just for teachers but for all staff who support the education within the school community.

It's a message that still needs to be said, loudly and often: every person in a school community deserves access to meaningful professional growth. EAs do extraordinary work. It's complex, relational, demanding, and yet they are often the last to be included in professional learning conversations. Watching that room come alive, watching people feel seen and valued in their professional roles, was a powerful reminder of the importance of inclusion and acknowledgement.

So Where Does This Leave Me?

Three experiences. Three very different communities. And the same thread running through all of them: professional learning needs to evolve to truly serve the individual.
 
As a coach, I know that the most powerful growth happens when someone feels known, when the learning is relevant to their actual work, and when there is space. The space has to be genuine and protected, to reflect, to question, to make meaning. We don't always build that into our school day or professional learning programs. We build content, we build schedules, we build programs. But do we build in the conditions that actually make learning stick? 
 
EduTECH showed me what happens when those conditions are missing...when there is noise but no silence, content but no conversation, presentations but no processing. The learning gets crowded out.
 
The EA conference showed me what happens when a group of people who are at times overlooked are given their own space to learn and connect. They thrive.
 
And the school-embedded PL reminded me that when you know your people, when the facilitator understands the room and the room trusts the facilitator, real things happen.
 
Professional learning is changing. It has to. The world our teachers are navigating brings rapid change and increasing complexity. This world demands something more responsive, more personalised, more human centred. I'm still sitting with the question of what that looks like in practice for a Pre-K through to Year 12 school that consists of teaching and non-teaching staff. But I know it starts with this: treat every learner as an individual with something to bring and something to grow into. Offer as much opportunity and experiences, and learn from other schools globally.

What does professional learning look like in your context? And who in your school community might be missing out on it?

Presenters and People I Connected With at EduTECH

Part of what makes a conference worthwhile is the people. Here are some of the sessions I attended and the educators I was lucky enough to learn from.
 

Sessions

•      MC Annabel Astbury (met at ISTE, USA in 2015, and she greeted me with, "Your boss is married to my boss!")
•      Aunty Julie Jones: Welcome to Country and Performance
•      Dr Andy Hargreaves: Teaching to repair the world: How to retain AND sustain a strong teaching profession
•      Dr Jason Reynolds: Literacy as liberation: Reimagining engagement for the TikTok generation
•      Matt Esterman, Anna Sever, Paul Tame: AI in the classroom: Supporting teaching and learning in practice
•      Dr Nick Jackson: AI ethics that doesn't bore learners to death
•      Dr Sarah McKay: Neuromyth to neuroscience: How to talk about the teenage brain
•      Julian Ridden, Adam Biggs, Peta Hicks: Smarter work, better outcomes: Using technology in education
•      Dr Andrew Fuller: Converting neurodiversity into neuro-advantage
•      Laura Bain: What if we designed schools today?
•      Dr John Cleary, Jenny Hanson, Dr Dan Edwards, Dr Theo Vlark and Scott O'Hara: Assessment reimagined: Charting the future for learners

Friends and Colleagues

Educators I was lucky enough to reconnect with through a simple smile, hello or hug: Carolyn Morrison, Briony Scott, Terrie Jones, Adam Voigt, Brenda Quayle, Bron Stuckey, Andy Draper, Sarah Warby, Hugh Gundlach, and the Radford IT Team. These are the connections that remind you the education community is small, generous, and worth showing up for.

Staying Curious,

Andrea

"Embracing Duality: Finding Value in Contrasting Perspectives"

Recently, I've come across comments or specific points of view, and I'm curious about the sources people use to acquire knowledge. Last week I presented my doctoral research at the AIS research symposium. Several individuals have expressed interest in my study and my viewpoint on doctoral research. This led me to reevaluate my perspective, which is primarily shaped by my personal experiences, the reading of research texts, and discussions with individuals who possess greater knowledge and experience.

                                                                                      PhD or EdD

Which option is more advantageous depends on your goals. Students who wish to apply research to address real-world educational challenges often choose an EdD, a professional doctorate that is more practical. Individuals who aspire to become educators, administrators, policymakers, or organizational leaders frequently choose this degree. EdD programs emphasise practical research applications to enhance educational systems, policies, and practices, making them ideal for those who want to influence schools, districts, or education-focused groups. 

 

If you aspire to work in academia or research, where publishing and contributing to educational theory are significant, a PhD may be the most advantageous choice. While both pathways may be equally challenging and rewarding, each offers a unique approach to influencing education. I have spoken to friends in various countries who see both as different but equally valued. However, people here in Australia have said in passing, "You're only doing an EdD, not a PhD." I am curious if this viewpoint is evident in other countries.

To distinguish my EdD from a PhD, I wrote in my thesis: "A professional doctorate requires the dual role of practitioner and researcher. The intention of this professional doctorate is for me to develop a deeper understanding of research (Fox & Slade, 2014) and generate a “substantive piece of research in the field relevant” (Wildy et al., 2015, p. 768) for my professional practice as a coach and educator (Stringer, 2024).

Quantitative or Qualitative

Someone recently told me that he doesn't think qualitative data is sufficient and that he only values and reads research with quantitative data. This was the last thing I needed to hear before I presented my research. 

 

Some people feel quantitative data is “better” than qualitative data because it seems more objective, precise, and straightforward to analyse. People often perceive quantitative data as more reliable and less biased, citing the solidity and trustworthiness of numbers and statistical methods. Additionally, the use of standardised measurements in quantitative research allows for study replication, a crucial aspect in science for validating results. The precision of numbers also simplifies the measurement and comparison of findings; when comparing average scores across groups, the structured data simplifies the comparison process. Because quantitative methods often rely on larger sample sizes, people feel more comfortable using these results to make broader conclusions about bigger populations. Numbers also help turn complex information into clear statistics, charts, and graphs, making it easier to spot trends and patterns at a glance. In my research, one principal stated, "The qualitative evidence within doesn't meet muster with the quantitative evidence required by external authorities." 

 

However, qualitative data offers a unique depth and richness, capturing context, motives, feelings, and experiences—elements that quantitative data may overlook. This human side provides insights that reveal the “why” behind the numbers, bringing added meaning that pure statistics can’t fully capture. It was crucial to me to convey the perspectives and narratives of the coaches, principals, and early career educators. I am intrigued by the reasons why certain individuals do not believe that both equally contribute to educational research.

Scholar or Practitioner

I've heard some comments suggesting that it's impossible to excel in both areas. One individual expressed that I wasn't the 'academic' type, while another suggested that I should focus on my strengths and stay within my area of expertise. I'll let you sit with that comment. When I was provided an opportunity to develop my scholarly skills, I was advised that I should not consider the invitation to join the journal board, as I had not yet graduated. While I continue to engage with others and listen to their perspectives, these examples illustrate various perspectives that often influence decisions. It can be challenging to understand the culture when entering a new field; however, listening to too many people may possibly undermine your confidence.

While practitioner-researchers, scholar-practitioners, and pracademics all describe people who navigate both practical and intellectual worlds, they have different focuses. While the three terms reflect a blend of practical and academic pursuits, they each emphasise different aspects of that integration.

Practitioner-Researchers are individuals who not only work in their field but actively engage in research. They use data and evidence to inform their practice, aiming to improve outcomes. Their primary focus is on applying research methods to enhance practical effectiveness and find ways to implement research findings in real-world situations. The lead coaches in my study consistently pursued research to disseminate their expertise across their coaching staff, while enhancing their coaching practice.

Scholar-Practitioners highlight the dual roles of being a practitioner and a scholar. These individuals blend academic knowledge with hands-on experience, applying theoretical frameworks to solve practical problems. While they engage in research, they prioritise teaching, mentoring, and applying their scholarly insights to real-world challenges. Consultants with doctorates often apply theoretical knowledge, establishing evidence-based courses, which they facilitate in schools.

Pracademics engage in scholarly work while also applying their knowledge in practical settings. They may not emphasise the research aspect as strongly as the other two terms but they still contribute meaningfully to both fields. Their objective is frequently to provide a bridge between theory and practice, thereby, enhancing both with their perspectives. I have consistently prioritised bridging the divide, and this is where I see myself. 

What conclusions have I drawn from pondering this blog post? Base your selections on your enthusiasm, expertise, and independent research. Exercise caution against external negative influence, and believe in yourself. You don't want to regret squandered opportunities.  

Stay Curious,

Andrea

Burnard, P., Dragovic, T., Ottewell, K., & Lim, W. M. (2018). Voicing the professional doctorate and the researching professional's identity: Theorizing the EdD's uniqueness. London Review of Education,, 16(1), 40-55. 

Campbell, P., Hollweck, T., & Netolicky, D. M. (2023). Grappling with pracademia in education: Forms, functions, and futures. In (pp. 65-83). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33746-8_6 

Fox, A., & Slade, B. (2014). What impact can organisations expect from professional doctorates? Professional Development in Education, 40(4), 546-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.843579 

Poultney, V. (2010). Challenging the PhD: Managing the alignment of an EdD programme alongside a traditional PhD pathway. Work Based Learning e-Journal, 1(1), 71-84.

Stringer, A. (2024). Coaching Early Career Teachers: Exploring the Implementation of Coaching in Schools for Professional Growth. University of New South Wales.]. University of New South Wales Library. 

Wildy, H., Peden, S., & Chan, K. (2015). The rise of professional doctorates: Case studies of the Doctorate in Education in China, Iceland and Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 40(5), 761-774. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842968 

Slayed the Dragon

Regrettably, my first year of school was highly memorable for all the wrong reasons, and this was only one of the contributing factors. In Grade 1, reading was my nemesis. I vividly recall strategising to read the smallest paragraph during round-robin sessions, driven by an intense desire to escape any unwanted attention. That year, once brimming with confidence and curiosity, I transformed into an anxious, self-doubting student struggling with words on a page. While I initially relied on memorizing words, I eventually discovered that glasses were the solution. Although using glasses resolved the reading problem, the experience had long-lasting consequences. Despite confidently performing ballet in front of audiences, reading and speaking to an audience remained challenging. 25 years later, as a mature-aged student, I had extreme nervousness and anxiety before my first university presentation, to the extent that I was physically ill. 

My journey took a pivotal turn with my first mentor, Japhy, during my practicum teaching. His curiosity about my nervousness about reading aloud led to a deeper understanding of my past. He provided me with the space and encouragement to develop these skills, and within a few weeks, I was leading lessons and reading aloud to other classes. Through Japhy, I learned the profound importance of understanding the "why" behind a lack of confidence.

Fast forward a few years, and my professional roles required more public speaking and leading workshops that developed my skills. A university recently requested my participation in a Q&A session, which evolved into a 45–60-minute presentation devoid of slides. Surprisingly, the hour flew by, and I relished the experience. I drew on my identities as a researcher, teacher, and coach, and for the first time, I felt excited and calm about presenting my research.

Today, I presented my research to doctoral students and candidates from numerous EdD cohorts and their supervisors. Due to the inability to access my notes, I resorted to speaking to the slides. Although it was not flawless, I felt relaxed and comfortable. Today, I closed the chapter on my doctoral journey and celebrate the improvement of my ability to talk confidently in public. As is the case with any issue that is not resolved at the outset, my dragon grew. My journey from that anxious Grade 1 student to a confident presenter may have taken years, but today I finally feel that I slayed the dragon.

Thanks for reading,

Andrea

Empowering Educators: Navigating AI, Teacher Agency, and Lesson Planning

In November 2022, ChatGPT became publicly available, marking its initial release for widespread use. This milestone allowed users to interact with the model and explore its capabilities. However, as I approached the final stages of submitting my thesis after four years of work, caution prevailed. With universities lacking clear guidelines or established regulations, exploring AI was not an option for me. It was more important to me to err on the side of caution and safeguard my research and professional standing. 

Today's landscape often resides in shades of grey rather than black and white. Is using spell check or Microsoft Editor cheating? Is it the same as hiring someone to edit your thesis? Arguments for and against AI in research abound. I felt it was crucial to grasp the fundamentals first. For example, students must develop number sense before relying on calculators. I needed to master research basics without AI's influence on my methodology or thinking. I view research as reflecting one's professional experience, ethos, and personal approach. Ethical considerations loom large in AI's use, both personally and professionally. Issues of data privacy, confidentiality, and ownership pose significant questions. When does work cease to be solely yours? When and where should AI be used to promote learning and provide support?

I have been contemplating ways to provide additional support for beginning teachers, particularly in light of the teacher shortages. I interact with pre-service and early career teachers and pursue methods to enhance their teaching and learning. A lesson plan can serve as a scaffold for newcomers to the field, and understanding its components is essential. Lesson plans are roadmaps that specify the outcomes, materials, procedures, and assessment methods for a single class period. It concentrates on the lesson's teaching content, activities, discussions, and assessments, frequently down to minute-by-minute instructions. Experienced teachers don't often create lesson plans to guide their teaching but rely on units or work that are more detailed than the program. Despite its time-intensive nature, crafting a lesson plan fosters invaluable learning. It teaches pacing, activity differentiation, and formative assessment integration, ensuring students understand in real time.

While ChatGPT can generate lesson plans, empowering beginning teachers to create their own is paramount. Lesson planning is the foundation for teacher autonomy, as it ensures structured, efficient content delivery, supports diverse student needs, and enhances the overall coherence of the learning experience. In essence, lesson planning is not merely a procedural task; it allows teachers to demonstrate their professional competence, make educated instructional decisions, and ultimately improve student learning results. Then, once the process has been mastered, employ ChatGPT to create lesson plans that can be tailored to reflect the context and your creativity.

I am looking forward to reading Matt and Nick's new book, The Next Word. 

Always learning,

p.s. Today, I explored using AI to create a lesson plan. My prompts: Create a lesson plan for a Year 2 maths class in New South Wales focused on 2-dimensional shapes. The lesson period is 45 minutes. Include a literature book related to shapes. Include formative assessment. The lesson plan resembled one I had created 15 years ago and even included the same 'The Greedby Triangle' book. Nevertheless, sometimes you don't know what you don't know; therefore, it is essential to learn from and interact with others in the field. 

My 100th blogpost in 10 years.

Today is a significant milestone as I celebrate my 100th blog post! Looking back to where it all began a decade ago, with the encouragement of my friend Matt Esterman, fills me with gratitude. I started this journey with a flurry of content, but during my doctoral years, the frequency took a hit – except when Prof Sahlberg nudged my cohort to pen Op-Eds located in April & May 2019. (shoutout to Pasi for the push!). Today, I've decided to take a stroll down memory lane by revisiting my previous blog posts, including a reflective piece from 2020. For me, this blog serves as more than just words on a screen; it captures snapshots of my evolving thoughts, beliefs, and experiences, akin to entries in a personal diary. I analysed my writing in search of recurring themes and common threads and discovered change, connection, continuous learning, collaboration, and coaching.

Reflecting on my journey, I remember my first entry about not feeling smart enough for university and the apprehension I felt before hitting the publish button. The level of vulnerability required felt overwhelming, as I lacked the confidence to share my thoughts without seeking approval from others. But over time, I've grown in confidence, addressing complex educational issues such as I'll ride with you, More than Thanks, and teacher retention, naturally intertwining my personal experiences with my teaching identity.

Identity isn't static; it's a complex tapestry woven from personal and professional experiences, qualifications, personality traits, and values. Context and role responsibilities also play a significant role in shaping who we are. As I've navigated through different experiences and contexts over the years, I've watched my identity shift and evolve like a chameleon adapting to its surroundings. Change is inevitable, and it's only natural that our identities evolve along with us.

Connecting with others has always been a cornerstone of education. The post titled "So, what's in it for you?" struck a chord with many, and for good reason. Back then, Twitter was the driving force behind the growth of TeachMeets, fostering learning and forging connections among schools, leaders, and educators. As a moderator of Twitter Chats, such as #SatchOC, I witnessed firsthand the power of these digital platforms in facilitating meaningful exchanges and professional growth. Building relationships and cultivating a professional learning network (PLN) became more than just buzzwords—they were essential elements of thriving in the educational landscape. Whether it was connecting with academics or fellow educators, whether it involved climbing a bridge or venturing to professional learning opportunities overseas, the quest for knowledge and camaraderie knows no bounds. 

Collaboration and connection have always been recurring themes in my blog posts, evident in numerous entries over the last decade. Whether venturing to schools in Canberra or Brisbane, or Southern NSW or more locally, the spirit of learning through collaboration thrived. One area where collaboration truly shone was in coaching and continuous learning. It's no surprise that coaching made frequent appearances throughout my posts. In a world where the mantra "out with the old and in with the new" often reigns supreme, I challenged this notion. Self-determination and recognizing the expertise within the classroom have also been recurring themes. Being observed in the classroom wasn't just a professional expectation; it served as a pivotal moment for engaging in meaningful coaching conversations. It was through these observations and subsequent discussions that true growth and evolution were nurtured.

From highlighting the invaluable guidance of coaches in my life to reflecting on classroom observations, the journey of growth and development was a constant thread. One of the highlights of this journey was my Fellowship to the US, which I documented in eight captivating blog posts under the hashtag #EdVentures, back in June and July of 2015. These posts and others chronicle my professional growth and showcase how I seamlessly blended work with play, blurring the lines between the two.

Throughout my blogging journey, the theme of leadership and women in leadership remained prominent, from celebrating women role models and raising me up, to supporting and advocating for gender equality. Peter Holmes so aptly said, "We need gender mix in leadership. We're all stronger & wiser for it." Rennaisance Women Leaders' Network featured strongly as we celebrated the collective and those who inspire. I explored this topic with passion. 

My doctoral journey has been filled with unexpected challenges and pleasant surprises, yet it has been a defining chapter in my life characterised by resilience, perseverance, and ultimately, achievement. What's truly remarkable is how my blog posts have evolved into a visual representation of this professional growth journey, aligning closely with the topics and themes explored in my thesis. It's fascinating to observe how the concepts I pondered in my early blog entries, such as coaching, self-determination, proving or improving and the delicate balance of confidence and humility, resonate deeply with the findings of my academic research. This alignment is particularly noteworthy considering it predates the publication of Adam Grant's "Think Again" and his discourse on confident humility. What initially may have appeared as simple musings have now transformed into tangible reflections of my evolving beliefs and values. 

Despite time, the foundational principles that guided my early writings have remained steadfast, illuminating my path through academic and professional pursuits.  Among the myriad posts, one stands out as a catalyst for change: it ignited the creation of #ConnectTheDocs, a movement I regard as the epitome of networking, education, and achievement melded seamlessly. This initiative serves as a testament to the profound impact of collaboration and community in empowering individuals striving to enact positive change in the educational landscape of tomorrow.

Thanks for reading,

Loosening the Shackles: Empowering Growth and Innovation

After the demanding requirements of finishing my doctoral thesis, the mere thought of delving into another scholarly endeavour feels draining. Instead, I find myself drawn back to the realm of blogging. A genre exemplifying simplicity and freedom of expression, characterised by authenticity and spontaneity. Here, I can unleash my thoughts without the shackles of formal academia, explore my wonderings, and share insights. The spark for this post ignited from conversations with close friends deeply entrenched in the world of education. We delved into the pressing issue of teacher shortages and how they are casting a long shadow over teacher learning and wellbeing, which in turn, impacts student learning and wellbeing. It's evident that education, post-COVID and amidst the rise of artificial intelligence, is undergoing significant transformation. In addition, there appear to be additional influences seeping in from various sources. As we adapt to the ever-changing demands of the modern classroom, the need for contextualised support and personalised growth opportunities has never been more pressing. 

Before X, Twitter provided me with a glimpse into schools, offering snapshots of innovation in action. Despite their brevity, these insights fueled my curiosity, leading me to visit schools during the holidays. Twitter may have offered only brief glimpses, but it started a journey of discovery that resulted in tangible evidence of innovation. This is one element of Twitter I miss, as I feel I no longer have my finger on the pulse of innovative schools. As a teacher and coach, I gained an insider's perspective. However, transitioning to consultancy work and with the decline of Twitter, I now rely on personal connections and professional relationships to understand the current challenges being faced in schools. 

As I reflect on the landscape of education today, one question comes to mind: do school leaders have the autonomy, time, and support necessary to reimagine school-embedded professional learning? It's a question that strikes at the heart of educational innovation and the ongoing quest for effectiveness in teaching and learning. Professional learning (PL) lies at the core of a thriving school community. It sustains the growth and development of educators, empowering them to adapt to the ever-evolving needs of students and society. Yet, in many cases, the traditional model of PL falls short of meeting these lofty aspirations. The constraints of time and resources often hinder school leaders in their efforts to revolutionise PL. Caught in the whirlwind of administrative duties and measures of compliance and accountability, they may find themselves with limited capacity to dedicate to the task of reimagining PL experiences for their staff. In an era of top-down mandates, school leaders may feel shackled by a lack of freedom to chart their own path when it comes to PL The cookie-cutter approach to professional development stifles creativity and innovation, which may become a box-ticking exercise rather than a catalyst for meaningful growth and change.

While it's crucial for initiatives to be grounded in research, merely relying on established findings can lead to stagnation. True innovation requires more than just regurgitating what's already known; it demands a creative synthesis of existing knowledge with fresh perspectives and novel approaches. In essence, while research serves as a guiding light, it's the willingness to push boundaries, challenge assumptions, and explore uncharted territory that truly drives progress in education. Tom Guskey’s recent article reminded me of a proposal I wrote years ago for a school-embedded PL program/institute that included a researcher in residence, who supported the development of teacher capacity through action research, coaching, and data analysis. The growing recognition of the need for personalised, job-embedded PL is paving the way for a new era, although Katherine Hoekman stated that this practice has migrated to various schools. As educators and policymakers alike begin to embrace the principles of autonomy, collaboration, and continuous improvement, we have an opportunity to redefine what PL looks like in practice in all schools.

School leaders must be empowered to take the reins and drive meaningful change in the realm of PL. They need the autonomy to design PL experiences that are tailored to the unique needs and context of their school community. This may involve fostering a culture of collaboration, leveraging technology to facilitate ongoing learning, or creating opportunities for job-embedded coaching and mentorship. Furthermore, school leaders require the support and resources necessary to bring their vision for PL to life. This may entail investing in PL opportunities for staff, providing time and space for collaborative enquiry and reflection, or partnering with external organisations to access expertise and resources. The success of any educational initiative hinges on the commitment and vision of its leaders. By empowering school leaders and leadership teams with the autonomy, time, and support needed to reimagine school-embedded PL, we can unlock the full potential of our educators.

Always curious,

Andrea 

Embracing Identity, Growth, and Learning

In today's fast-paced world, it's easy to become entangled in the rush of life, frequently defining ourselves by our actions, professions, and external accomplishments. However, your true identity isn't solely based on what you do, but rather, it's all about who you are as a person. This concept lies at the heart of a profound saying: "Your identity is not what you do, but who you are."

    Defining my true identity goes beyond my achievements; it encompasses my values, beliefs, passions, and character. My values guide my decisions and actions, reflecting my moral compass. My passion for coaching in education provides a sense of purpose and contributes to a well-rounded identity. My character strengths, determined by VIA, include qualities such as honesty, kindness, curiosity, and humility, which I've come to realise are often more profound aspects of identity than any job title.

    Your identity isn't fixed; it's a dynamic and ever-evolving part of your life. I've come to understand that embracing personal growth and self-improvement is a fundamental part of my identity journey. Every experience, whether it's a triumph or a challenge, has been a lesson that I've used to shape a more genuine and improved version of myself.
As I approach the final stages of my doctoral journey, I can't help but reflect on the five-year process that has brought me to this point of offering consultancy services. I wish I could tell you that it has been a smooth and confidence-building process, but the reality has been quite different. My research journey has been filled with multiple challenges, personal wins, and countless opportunities for personal and professional growth.
     Curiosity has been the driving force behind my research journey. It's the spark that ignites the process, urging me to explore uncharted territories of knowledge. But as I've delved deeper, I've learned that it's not just about finding answers; it's about the art of refining questions to uncover the essence of the matter at hand. The process has been a fascinating exploration of not just what we know, but how we come to know it. Knowledge and skills I will apply when implementing Contextual Coaching.

I've come to realise that research, much like life, is far from a straightforward, linear path. It's more like a winding trail with unexpected twists and turns. Along the way, I've encountered various obstacles, faced setbacks, and had processes that didn't quite go as planned. These moments have been invaluable teachers, highlighting the significance of resilience, adaptability, and the ability to be patient and remain optimistic. I've become adept at critical thinking and problem-solving and learned how to analyse data, assess information critically, and develop creative solutions to complex problems. Research is a dynamic process that often yields valuable insights, but the true value lies in effective communication. Presenting my research at AARE and ICSEI aims to amplify the impact of my research and extend its reach. It's important that my research transcends the confines of a written thesis and extends to teachers, researchers, and policymakers. Ethical considerations in data collection and the dissemination of results heightened my ethical consciousness that influences my decision-making in my consultancy business and other aspects of my life.

    In my personal journey, I've come to understand that the dynamic world of knowledge and research demands ongoing adaptation, reading, and the embrace of fresh ideas. The commitment to lifelong learning is an asset and treasure. For me, being able to pose critical questions, navigate through setbacks, and convey complex ideas has equipped me with the tools to make meaningful contributions to my community and society. The valuable lessons and knowledge learned as a research student will contribute to and enrich my consultancy business. Please contact me if you're interested in coaching in education. andrea@contextualcoaching.com.au

Always learning, 

Andrea 

"Let Them Leave Well"

    Years ago, a friend shared that, as a teenager, others would talk about moving out of home and living together. She thought that was something people did after reaching a certain age. However, this was not her parents’ view. She was told that if she left home, she would not be welcomed back—simple as that. At the time, she accepted this because no one in her family had ever moved out except to get married. It was a family expectation, and she didn’t feel secure enough to push the boundary or take the risk.

    As a parent, I am reminded of that story more often these days. I view my child moving out as a symbol of independence. They broaden their perspectives by living with others, acquire new skills such as paying bills and budgeting, and gain new experiences by living with peers. Yes, I would miss them, but it’s about them, not me. Although living in Sydney does not provide affordable housing for young single adults, and the likelihood of my children moving out is low, I would not view it negatively. My colleague’s parents may have perceived a child leaving home as a sign of unhappiness or discontentment within the family. In my case, I would view it as a strength of my child, not an indication of something lacking at home. I suppose it’s all about perspective.

     I recently attended an ACEL presentation, “A synthesized model of teacher turnover” by Dr Hugh Gundlach. He and Gavin Slemp spent four years working on a meta-analysis on teacher turnover. This was of particular interest given our current situation in New South Wales and my research into supporting early career teachers. I’d like to highlight one of Hugh's points from his presentation: “Let them leave well.” He unpacked this idea by asking whether school leaders provide teachers with a positive experience when they depart a school. The data presented indicated that teachers join the profession because of their passion for learning, working with young people, contributing to society, and salary. Given the current situation, I am curious whether contributing to society and salary have changed as motivating factors.

    In my experience, individuals leave teaching—or leave a particular school—for several reasons: lack of stable employment, a partner's job transfer, or the responsibility of caring for ageing parents. Some also leave to learn, grow, and gain experience in other contexts or fields. I was once told that sometimes you need to “move to improve” or “go to grow.”    

    I recognise that an effective teacher leaving a school is detrimental to students and the school community, and it increases the principal's responsibility to recruit new staff. This is especially challenging given the current teacher shortage. I am drawn back to the number one reason teachers leave or stay in the profession: job satisfaction. From the data findings, Hugh shared several questions principals could ask.

1. Was the teacher’s departure voluntary?
2. Is the teacher’s departure a loss for the school?
3. Could the school have done anything to prevent the departure? 

    Now, before anyone questions why the school or principal is responsible, it is crucial to acknowledge what is within one’s control. Responses are pivotal, but what struck me most was the statement, “Let them leave well.” Stories were shared about supporting colleagues to gain unique experiences and learn in different environments. We heard from one participant about a school that could not provide a particular opportunity but assured the teacher that they were always welcome to return—and eventually, they did.

 Teacher retention is of the utmost importance, and while some believe that new government initiatives will help, I fear they may backfire. Teachers need an increase in salary and a decrease in workload, but above all, they need to be respected as professionals.

    When support is lacking, I believe schools and leaders will be forced to develop long-term strategies. For example, there may not be a current opportunity, but by ensuring a “leave well” experience, teachers may return in the future with new knowledge and insights to share. As the findings suggest, there is less research on moving schools than on leaving the profession altogether, and less research on factors such as social approval, career structure, and wellbeing.

    The persistent lack of professional respect may stem from government actions or inactions, society’s limited understanding,  negative media coverage, and unfavourable working conditions—all of which require attention. Unfortunately, principals and leaders often have limited options. However, one thing they can do is ensure that the classroom door remains ajar by helping effective teachers leave well.

    Leaving is not necessarily a reflection of the family or school environment; sometimes it occurs due to circumstances, or out of a need for independence, wellbeing, or personal growth. If teachers leave on a positive note, they may be encouraged to return to the classroom or to the school in the future.  

Always curious,

@stringer_andrea

A few Reforms & Initiatives- 

https://www.nsw.gov.au/media-releases/teacher-rewards

https://education.nsw.gov.au/news/latest-news/modernising-schools-means-brighter-future-for-students

https://education.nsw.gov.au/news/latest-news/public-schools-celebrate-excellence-and-innovation-

https://education.nsw.gov.au/about-us/rights-and-accountability/complaints-compliments-and-suggestions/guide-for-parents-carers-and-students

https://education.nsw.gov.au/news/latest-news/schools-across-nsw-unite-to-improve-respect-

https://education.nsw.gov.au/teach-nsw/get-paid-to-study/teach-for-australia-partnership-program

https://education.nsw.gov.au/content/dam/main-education/about-us/strategies-and-reports/media/documents/NSW-teacher-supply-strategy.pdf